[CODATA-international] Ethical issues of Digital Feudalism affecting Indigeneous communities

[Falk Huettmann]

Hello,

re. indigenous people,
the last thing that should probably happen here is that a few white and
privileged people and institutions claim to speak for those indigenous
communities.
I propose these communities would articulate their own policies and express
them, and/or be given a forum to do so.
It's the latter though that was often missing, and contributes to the
problems we see.

It should probably also be stated that there is likely not just one
singular voice and opinion on indigenous issues by indeginous people,
even if it pertains the same subject matter and location/village.

Same applies to anthropologists and social scientists often involved there.

The understanding of a democratic process differs a lot, and when elders
and families play a major role.

Thanks for bringing this up.

No offense, but it is also my view and experience that the EU, big NGO and
traditional science perspective is often 100% off on those issues,
just due to the bad history, colonies, persistent neo-colonialism and the
reality of no indigenous people and voices
left there. It makes it hard to have a truly meaningful communication and
understanding with those purely
industry-driven nations, leaders and representatives on those matters and
when their power is to be shared.

More to be said but please keep us informed.

Just my perspective and opinion/reply on Suchith's question..

Thanks, very best
   Falk Huettmann  PhD, Professor
     Uni of Alaska Fairbanks


On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 4:59 AM Suchith Anand <
Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

>
> Dear colleagues,
>
>
> I am working on an article for EthicalGEO [1] on Ethics of Digital
> Feudalism in Location Data  .There are many ethical questions  that arise
> when  Digital Feudalism, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Location Data  intersect
> [2].  Details at
>
>
> https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/geospatial-ig/post/ethics-digital-feudalism-gis
>
>
> I came across an article on Indigenous Data Sovereignty at
>
>
> https://medium.com/technology-solidarity/indigenous-data-sovereignty-in-southeast-asia-with-pyrou-chung-b462db048cfe
>
>
> I am interested  to learn more on Ethical issues of Digital Feudalism  affecting
> Indigeneous communities.  There are approximately 476 million Indigenous
> Peoples worldwide, in over 90 countries. Although they make up over 6
> percent of the global population, they account for about 15 percent of the
> extreme poor. They safeguard 80 percent of the world’s remaining
> biodiversity. The land on which they live and the natural resources on
> which they depend are inextricably linked to their identities, cultures,
> livelihoods, as well as their physical and spiritual well-being. I respect
> the kindness, resilience, dignity and strength of indigenous peoples around
> the world.
>
>
> As Indigeneous communities play a key role as guardians of forests and
> biodiversity , are there any studies or any articles on the impact of AI
> based GIS/location platforms for Indigeneous communities?
>
>
> As some big GIS cloud platform companies/vendors also have verticals in
> the mining industry, oil & gas  etc, are there any ethical guidelines so
> that AI tools and insights developed in forest monitoring, conservation,
> biodiversity projects by AI based platforms are not used by the platform
> vendors for mining projects  in forests in the future?
>
>
> How will Digital Feudalism affect the economically poor? Are there any
> ethical guidelines to protect the rights of Indigeneous communities?   Are
> there any studies or any articles on the impact of AI based GIS/location
> platforms for Indigeneous communities? If so, please email me the
> publication details by 10th August 2020  so I can learn more and reference
> them in my article. Thanks.
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
> Suchith
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://ethicalgeo.org
>
> [2]
> https://www.godan.info/news/ethical-dimensions-digital-feudalism-agriculture
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
> where permitted by law.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CODATA-international mailing list
> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org
>
> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.codata.org/pipermail/codata-international_lists.codata.org/attachments/20200727/3eaa02c6/attachment.html>