[CODATA-international] follow up on data sharing examples

[David Mellor]

I've been very curious to track case studies of discoveries made or
research accelerated because of shared data or other open science practices
such as preregistration.

This example is interesting:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-019-0466-1 A published study was
criticized for deviations from their registered protocols. The authors
shared data on OSF and others have analyzed it. This paper is the original
authors asserting why their main points are still justified.

This twitter thread
https://twitter.com/_julia_stern/status/1176496566942781445 covers an
example of an arduous, preregistered multiverse analysis (which essentially
tries to run every combination of IV and DVs to show how often
significant outcomes occur in the dataset) of an open dataset.

I'll look through the other thread and add them to this google doc and will
look for other venues for disseminating these examples
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IEFmsfd5cPf7_6nUNOohPHzWLWnd0ZH7R4EaEylHje0/edit

Best,
David


David Mellor, PhD <https://osf.io/qthsf/>
Director of Policy Initiatives <https://cos.io/top>, Center for Open Science
@EvoMellor <https://twitter.com/@EvoMellor> and @RegReports
<https://twitter.com/regreports>
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3125-5888




On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 11:40 AM Kalpana Shankar <kalpana.shankar at ucd.ie>
wrote:

> This is a fabulous idea but nothing I can get to for a couple of weeks.
> I’m happy to set it up though!
>
> On Thursday, 7 November 2019, Ivo Grigorov <ivgr at aqua.dtu.dk> wrote:
>
>> Kalpana, all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it worth setting up an OSF space where we can crowdsource this effort?
>>
>> Or even as an “open lab book” for your own research effort based on the
>> based examples provided here?
>>
>>
>>
>> It could be a cool community resource to point to for all future Nature
>> editors who seek such precedents J
>>
>>
>>
>> Bests,
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* CODATA-international <
>> codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org> *On Behalf Of *Kalpana
>> Shankar
>> *Sent:* 6. november 2019 21:12
>> *To:* codata-international at lists.codata.org
>> *Subject:* [CODATA-international] follow up on data sharing examples
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello all -
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for this broad-ranging and fascinating suite of examples. I
>> started going down the rabbit hole of looking at them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Anatoly Volynets asked me how I came to this, and I admit it's not a
>> project but part of a paper. I was part of a COST Action on peer review (
>> peere.org) and we authored a piece on the need for data sharing in
>> journal peer review. We've received feedback from the journal Nature and
>> the editor asked if there were examples of competitors sharing data (the
>> editor found it highly unlikely!), which is what we were asking of
>> scientific publishers. Since research infrastructures and scholarly
>> practices cross over in my wheelhouse, I offered to track down examples - I
>> had a few, but not many, clearly.
>>
>>
>>
>> If anyone is interested in what we wrote, we have a preprint at SocArxiv:
>> https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/sr6eg/
>>
>>
>>
>> After looking at all these links, I'm wondering if there IS a project in
>> it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>
>> Kalpana
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kalpana Shankar
>> Professor, School of Information and Communication Studies
>>
>> Fellow, UCD Geary Institute for Public Policy
>>
>> University College Dublin
>>
>> Belfield 4
>> Dublin
>>
>>
>>
>> kalpana.shankar at ucd.ie
>>
>
>
> --
> Sent from my phone so please excuse typos and brevity.
> _______________________________________________
> CODATA-international mailing list
> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org
>
> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.codata.org/pipermail/codata-international_lists.codata.org/attachments/20191107/c8cc4776/attachment.html>