[CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory

Mark Parsons parsonsm.work at icloud.com
Mon Jan 10 21:41:09 EST 2022 

Ok, I can accept that, Geoffrey. I didn’t see that nuance in the earlier discussion. I do like the ISC definition of science though. (And I still think we’re not really clear on what open means)

cheers,

-m. 

> On Jan 10, 2022, at 5:21 PM, BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Dear Mark
> 
> I am afraid there’s much to fret about in the relationship between research and science. I think that there are many current and powerful trends in the practice of research that undermine the role of science as a global public good.   If that is indeed the case, then a new edifice of open science would be built on weak foundations. I therefore dispute the assertion that a research/science debate is merely semantic, and assert that consideration of the relationship is vital if we are to benefit from a new era of openness.
> 
> Geoffrey
> 
> Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRS FRSE
> Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus
> University of Edinburgh
> Grant Institute, Kings Buildings
> Edinburgh EH9 3JW
> Mob: 44 (0)7590978510
> Website: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton <http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton>
> 
> 
> 
>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 23:55, Mark Parsons <parsonsm.work at icloud.com <mailto:parsonsm.work at icloud.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
>> You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
>> I didn’t say forget the noun. Just a question of emphasis. And verbs are where the action is. 
>> 
>> Seems much more fruitful to discuss what open entails than fretting over differences in research vs science. 
>> 
>> -m.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 16:12, BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Mark, really! Forget about the noun, and the adjective is pointless, both in grammar and in science.
>>> 
>>> Geoffrey
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRS FRSE
>>> Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus
>>> University of Edinburgh
>>> Grant Institute, Kings Buildings
>>> Edinburgh EH9 3JW
>>> Mob: 44 (0)7590978510
>>> Website: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton <http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 22:42, Mark Parsons <parsonsm.work at icloud.com <mailto:parsonsm.work at icloud.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
>>>> You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
>>>> I wonder if we worry too much about the noun. Isn’t the real point the adjective—open. Or better yet the verb--to open. That’s where our focus should be. How do we actually open up science, research, scholarship, communication, society…? To what purpose?
>>>> 
>>>> cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> -m. 
>>>> 
>>>> Mark A. Parsons
>>>> Research Scientist
>>>> University of Alabama in Huntsville
>>>> +1 303 941 9986
>>>> Mail: 1550 Linden Ave, Boulder, CO 80304, USA
>>>> https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-0950 <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7723-0950>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 10, 2022, at 6:56 AM, BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just a reminder that Open Science is not new. It started seriously in the late 17th century with the first published scientific journals of the modern era. They enabled ideas to circulate rapidly between distant readers, which catalysed a creative chain reaction that triggered an explosion of knowledge. The modern open science movement is a broadening of the horizons of openness rather than its discovery. In part it is about relations between scientists and in part with society. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> We should also remember the old adage that "the best is the enemy of the good”. By excessively criticising our failure to achieve perfection, we undermine efforts to create the merely good.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Geoffrey
>>>>>  
>>>>> Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRS FRSE
>>>>> Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus
>>>>> University of Edinburgh
>>>>> Grant Institute, Kings Buildings
>>>>> Edinburgh EH9 3JW
>>>>> Mob: 44 (0)7590978510
>>>>> Website: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton <http://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 12:59, Tyng-Ruey Chuang <trc at iis.sinica.edu.tw <mailto:trc at iis.sinica.edu.tw>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
>>>>>> You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
>>>>>> Just my two cents to add to the conversation. Openness is contextual. For me, open implies access to resources which otherwise can be closed (e.g. open data); it also refers to a mode of production where participation is less restricted (e.g. open source development). Openness neither necessarily leads to inclusiveness nor equity, even though it may be used to invoke such ideals (e.g. open government). The trend in prepending "open" to an existing term so as to create the allure of openness in an ambiguous combined word, e.g. open research and open science, I think, is a problem we now have.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> best,
>>>>>> Tyng-Ruey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: "Haslinger Florian" <florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch <mailto:florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch>>
>>>>>> To: "Berkman, Paul Arthur" <pberkman at law.harvard.edu <mailto:pberkman at law.harvard.edu>>, "BOULTON Geoffrey" <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>>
>>>>>> Cc: "CODATA International" <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>, "Paul BERKMAN" <Paul.BERKMAN at unitar.org <mailto:Paul.BERKMAN at unitar.org>>
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 7:42:22 PM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That Unesco report mentions ‘open research’ only as ‘open reseach data’  -  which seems to be different than the understanding of ‘open research’ vs ‘open science’.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> (and very pragmatically – in that context I care less about the definition of ‘science’ than about the definition / implication of ‘open’ …)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: Berkman, Paul Arthur <pberkman at law.harvard.edu <mailto:pberkman at law.harvard.edu>> 
>>>>>> Sent: Montag, 10. Januar 2022 12:36
>>>>>> To: Haslinger Florian <florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch <mailto:florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch>>; BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>>
>>>>>> Cc: CODATA International <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>; Paul BERKMAN <Paul.BERKMAN at unitar.org <mailto:Paul.BERKMAN at unitar.org>>; Berkman, Paul Arthur <pberkman at law.harvard.edu <mailto:pberkman at law.harvard.edu>>
>>>>>> Subject: RE: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> Importance: High
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> With respect for the various perspectives, this discussion seems to forget the significant efforts of the international scientific community (natural sciences, social sciences and Indigenous knowledge) that contributed to the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science <https://www.unesco.org/en/natural-sciences/open-science>.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Prof. Paul Arthur Berkman
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Fulbright Arctic Chair Norway 2021-2022 <https://scidiplo.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/us-grantee-document-PR-PAUL-ARTHUR-BERKMAN-NORWAY-FULBRIGHT-ARCTIC-CHAIR-2021-22.pdf>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Associated Fellow, United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 7 bis, Avenue de la Paix, CH-1202 Geneva 2, Switzerland
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> paul.berkman at unitar.org <mailto:paul.berkman at unitar.org> | https://.unitar.org <https://.unitar.org/> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Faculty Associate, Program on Negotiation (PON) at Harvard Law School
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Associate Director of Science Diplomacy, Harvard-MIT Public Disputes Program
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 501 Pound Hall, Harvard University, 1563 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> pberkman at law.harvard.edu <mailto:pberkman at law.harvard.edu> | https://pon.harvard.edu <https://pon.harvard.edu/> | https://publicdisputes.mit.edu/ <https://publicdisputes.mit.edu/>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Director, Science Diplomacy Center, MIEP MGIMO
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO Univeristy)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 76, Prospect Vernadskogo Moscow, 119454, Russian Federation
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Chief Executive Officer, EvREsearch LTD
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Director, Science Diplomacy Center
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Coordinator, Arctic/Pan-Arctic Options projects supported by the US National Science Foundation (2013-2022)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 23 Woodrise, Falmouth, MA 02540, United States
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> paul at evresearch.com <mailto:paul at evresearch.com> | https://scidiplo.org <https://scidiplo.org/> | https://knohow.co <https://knohow.co/> | http://panarcticoptions.org <http://panarcticoptions.org/> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> (m) +1-617-902-8361
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Governing Arctic Seas: Regional Lessons from the Bering Strait and Barents Sea. Volume 1. Informed Decisionmaking for Sustainability <https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030256739> (2020) and Building Common Interests in the Arctic Ocean with Global Inclusion. Volume 2. Informed Decisionmaking for Sustainability <https://link.springer.com/book/9783030893118> (2022).  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: CODATA-international <codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org>> On Behalf Of Haslinger Florian
>>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 12:24 PM
>>>>>> To: BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>>
>>>>>> Cc: CODATA International <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> In the context of the ‘open’ discussion, wouldn’t the important issue be to figure out the ‘practical differences’ between open research and open science (if there are any)?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> There is a EU project resource that has ‘open reproducible research’ as one part of open science (and I wonder about the implications of ‘reproducible’ in this context): https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/FOSTER-taxonomy/open-science-definition <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.fosteropenscience.eu_FOSTER-2Dtaxonomy_open-2Dscience-2Ddefinition&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=pcc3NBoK2PpY5cPD7bgUloZiCoNNliKqBFicu5REGJM&e=>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I have the feeling that one could argue that ‘open research’ enforces the openness of data, methods, … more than ‘open science’ that would ‘just’ ask for the openness of the research results. To me that would be misleading, I would favor the interpretation that open science requires open research as one of its ingredients.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> But perhaps the discussion comes really from the interpretation / understanding that ‘science’ is not necessarily including humanities and social sciences (and arts in the English language context…)? (that seems to be the gist of this Wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_science <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__en.wikipedia.org_wiki_Open-5Fscience&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=LRwdkqi2kjt54-tgg9BJgg0kq77jArlzUmYTJl3l3Nk&e=> )
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> If that’s the case, shouldn’t we better ensure that the meaning / definition of science becomes (again) inclusive, and keep the distinction of ‘research’ as a process contributing to science, thus have ‘open research’ as an element of ‘open science’? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>> 
>>>>>> Sent: Montag, 10. Januar 2022 12:05
>>>>>> To: BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>>
>>>>>> Cc: Haslinger Florian <florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch <mailto:florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch>>; CODATA International <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Maybe the ISC position paper on "Science as a Global Public Good” (attached) might help. “Research as a Global Public Good” would not work. Why, because research is an activity, science is an outcome.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Geoffrey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRS FRSE
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> University of Edinburgh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Grant Institute, Kings Buildings
>>>>>> Edinburgh EH9 3JW
>>>>>> Mob: 44 (0)7590978510
>>>>>> Website: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.geos.ed.ac.uk_homes_gboulton&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=oSZ6hnNs4yTN_rpRR7FDdgvTCk-_hAgmvG2-QHScgA8&e=>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 10:22, BOULTON Geoffrey <Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk <mailto:Geoff.Boulton at ed.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Just to break in, research and science are not synonymous. Science is s process that requires openness to scrutiny, but I can carryout research for my own purposes that is never made accessible for scrutiny. You can argue that “open research = science”, but I think that leads to severe semantic difficulties. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> It's true that the word science in English, if used alone, tends to be used to refer primarily to natural science. Increasingly people use the word more broadly, in the sense of the German Wissenschaft. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Geoffrey
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Geoffrey Boulton OBE FRS FRSE
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regius Professor of Geology Emeritus
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> University of Edinburgh
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Grant Institute, Kings Buildings
>>>>>> Edinburgh EH9 3JW
>>>>>> Mob: 44 (0)7590978510
>>>>>> Website: www.geos.ed.ac.uk/homes/gboulton <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.geos.ed.ac.uk_homes_gboulton&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=oSZ6hnNs4yTN_rpRR7FDdgvTCk-_hAgmvG2-QHScgA8&e=>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> On 10 Jan 2022, at 08:50, Haslinger Florian <florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch <mailto:florian.haslinger at sed.ethz.ch>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> This email was sent to you by someone outside the University.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Daureen,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Thanks  for the links!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Quick question – why would you prefer the use of ‘open research’ rather than ‘open science’?  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From all I could find, they should be ‘interchangeable’ (i.e. synonymous (really?)) ?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> (I find the lack of clarity  / authoritative definitions of the terms used in these discussions very frustrating – it allows too many easy escapes for my taste – so anything towards more strict definitions would be most appreciated.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Thanks for any comments!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: CODATA-international <codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org>> On Behalf Of Daureen Nesdill
>>>>>> Sent: Freitag, 7. Januar 2022 19:29
>>>>>> To: Suchith Anand <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>; CODATA International <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> That is not all NASA is doing.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They are organizing the 2023 Year of Open Science
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/nasa/Transform-to-Open-Science <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_nasa_Transform-2Dto-2DOpen-2DScience&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=ZCYUpnAUZRBHK-sIksaggT3JNV76DSkqrTzkwehsES8&e=>
>>>>>> https://science.nasa.gov/open-science/transform-to-open-science <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__science.nasa.gov_open-2Dscience_transform-2Dto-2Dopen-2Dscience&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=-qxpQ3J51o8aTmDjwqOkxBFBDPv5JmZWt7saYvLIXGA&e=>
>>>>>> https://sparcopen.org/news/2022/nasa-year-of-open-science-set-to-launch-in-2023/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__sparcopen.org_news_2022_nasa-2Dyear-2Dof-2Dopen-2Dscience-2Dset-2Dto-2Dlaunch-2Din-2D2023_&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=VpmYt7JicxZpzf98RzLu7CWOH5vF2EwP3AMQnI7JYp8&e=>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Just wish they would say open research instead of open science
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Daureen Nesdill MS MLIS
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Research Data Management Librarian
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Campus Administrator for Labarchives
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://campusguides.lib.utah.edu/labarchives/home <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__campusguides.lib.utah.edu_labarchives_home&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=zQ6Dy2gvAiAFaPATyvVNtMG54jghE9u236YGR1bUtMo&e=>
>>>>>> Please leave a message at 801-585-5975
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> From: CODATA-international <codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international-bounces at lists.codata.org>> On Behalf Of Suchith Anand
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 8:19 AM
>>>>>> To: CODATA International <codata-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:codata-international at lists.codata.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: [CODATA-international] Open Source Science for the Earth System Observatory
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> This NASA study and workshops might be of interest. This is an opportunity to shape the next generation of Earth Observing missions that are currently in development.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Details at https://earthdata.nasa.gov/esds/open-science/oss-for-eso-workshops <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__earthdata.nasa.gov_esds_open-2Dscience_oss-2Dfor-2Deso-2Dworkshops&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=muflkJNR0YIWu9FdGmHKu7XOXRmZPfjrCPxIu8T37O8&e=>
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I would like to thank NASA colleagues for their contributions for open geospatial science.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Best wishes
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Suchith
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>>>>>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>>>>>> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
>>>>>> attachment. 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
>>>>>> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
>>>>>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
>>>>>> where permitted by law.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CODATA-international mailing list
>>>>>> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:CODATA-international at lists.codata.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.codata.org_mailman_listinfo_codata-2Dinternational-5Flists.codata.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=jV2b7XiYIRVL1-Fmnb8Qb13rHQQ5wncQxBrjkVb1B2U&e=>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The CODATA International list is for announcement of of activities, events and outputs by CODATA and by other organisations and initiatives.  It is also for discussion of all issues related to data.  It is an open subscription list with only lightweight moderation to remove spam.  Messages posted on the list by third parties do not necessarily imply endorsement by CODATA.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh Dhùn Èideann, clàraichte an Alba, àireamh clàraidh SC005336.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CODATA-international mailing list
>>>>>> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:CODATA-international at lists.codata.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.codata.org_mailman_listinfo_codata-2Dinternational-5Flists.codata.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=WO-RGvefibhHBZq3fL85hQ&r=kpLJS7LfkSf7gLodQQ9R2F9kXFw1PnnUtyinpCqBF3w&m=6ypYgET9PrblW2x12oUfoKqcNyGn9FxDNgho1b3BJBSyx-69gL3WGBP0L-wG_cyf&s=jV2b7XiYIRVL1-Fmnb8Qb13rHQQ5wncQxBrjkVb1B2U&e=>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The CODATA International list is for announcement of of activities, events and outputs by CODATA and by other organisations and initiatives.  It is also for discussion of all issues related to data.  It is an open subscription list with only lightweight moderation to remove spam.  Messages posted on the list by third parties do not necessarily imply endorsement by CODATA.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CODATA-international mailing list
>>>>>> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:CODATA-international at lists.codata.org>
>>>>>> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org <http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The CODATA International list is for announcement of of activities, events and outputs by CODATA and by other organisations and initiatives.  It is also for discussion of all issues related to data.  It is an open subscription list with only lightweight moderation to remove spam.  Messages posted on the list by third parties do not necessarily imply endorsement by CODATA.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CODATA-international mailing list
>>>>> CODATA-international at lists.codata.org <mailto:CODATA-international at lists.codata.org>
>>>>> http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org <http://lists.codata.org/mailman/listinfo/codata-international_lists.codata.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> The CODATA International list is for announcement of of activities, events and outputs by CODATA and by other organisations and initiatives.  It is also for discussion of all issues related to data.  It is an open subscription list with only lightweight moderation to remove spam.  Messages posted on the list by third parties do not necessarily imply endorsement by CODATA.
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.codata.org/pipermail/codata-international_lists.codata.org/attachments/20220110/19ad2028/attachment.html>

More information about the CODATA-international mailing list